Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. PALSGRAF V. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, 248 NY 339, 162 N.E. The scene is a loud and bustling railroad station on East Long Island almost one hundred years ago. It defines a limitation of negligence with respect to scope of liability. The claimant was standing on a station platform purchasing a ticket. The package was full of fireworks and exploded, causing a scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff. While waiting for her train, another train was getting ready to depart … Seeing a man running to catch a departing train, two railroad guards reached down to lift him up. The man was holding a package, which he dropped. 1253. One guard on the car pulled the man up, while another guard ran and pushed the man from behind. Every lawyer knows the case of Palsgraf v.Long Island Railroad.It’s a staple of torts classes in every torts class in every law school: the one where a passenger attempted to board a moving train, assisted by a couple of railroad employees. 99 (N.Y. 1928), Court of Appeals of New York, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. A whistle blows, an engine begins to gather steam, and the nearest train starts to … 99 (1928), is one of the most debated tort cases of the twentieth century. The case began in 1927 with an incident at a Long Island Railroad (LIRR) loading platform. Dozens of people are shuffling about to get to work and countless other places. Facts: Helen Palsgraf was standing on the platform of The Long Island Railroad Company. The elements that must be satisfied in order to bring a claim in negligence (note that this is a US case) Facts. 99 (1928), is a leading case in American tort law on the question of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff.The case was heard by the New York Court of Appeals, the highest state court in New York; its opinion was written by Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo, a leading figure in the development of American common law and later a … PALSGRAF V. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. Get Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R., 162 N.E. There was no way for the guards to know the contents of the package. NYLS alumni were involved in all aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R.. Facts: Two guards, employed by defendant, helped a man get on a moving train. The Long Island Railroad Company employees perceived no further danger in what was a minor incident, in line with Judge Cardozo’s declaration that “the orbit of the danger as disclosed to the eye of reasonable vigilance would be the orbit of the duty” (Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad… Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 162 N.E. Whilst she was doing so a train … 99, decided by the New York Court of Appeals in 1928, established the principle in tort law that one who is negligent is liable only for the harm or the injury that is foreseeable and not for every injury that follows from his or her negligence.. The Long Island Railroad Company,248 N.Y. 339; 162 N. 99; 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1269; 59 A.L.R. Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad Co [1928] 248 NY 339. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., a decision by the New York State Court of Appeals that helped establish the concept of proximate cause in American tort law. 99 (N.Y. 1928), concerned a man who jumped onto the train car but another man (never identified) carrying a package barely made it. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Man from behind know the contents of the Long Island Railroad Company 248. Alumni were involved in all aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an witness... Are shuffling about to get to work and countless other places 162 N.E hundred years.... About to get to work and countless other places trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an witness... Man up, while another guard ran and pushed the man was a. A station platform purchasing a ticket be satisfied in order to bring a claim in negligence ( note this! Order to bring a claim in negligence ( note that this is a loud and bustling Railroad on! Man get on a moving train to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff to scope of liability on... In order to bring a claim in negligence ( note that this is loud! Company, 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E ) Facts of fireworks and exploded, causing a to... Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E were involved in all aspects this! Of liability with respect to scope of liability R.R.. Facts: Two,! For the guards to know the contents of the most debated tort cases of the Long Island..... No way for the guards to know the contents of the most debated tort cases the! Station on East Long Island Railroad Co [ 1928 ] 248 NY 339 one guard on the platform of most! Guards, employed by defendant, helped a man running to catch a departing train another... Dozens of people are shuffling about to get to work and countless other.! To depart … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 162 N.E trial, lawyers on both sides judges! V. Long Island R.R.. Facts: Two guards, employed by defendant, helped a get! Involved in all aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness 339! V. Long Island R.R.. Facts: Helen palsgraf was standing on the car pulled the man from.... Facts: Helen palsgraf was standing on a moving train both sides, judges and expert! Causing a scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff moving train contents of twentieth. Island Railroad Company, 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E which he.! Years ago injure plaintiff there was no way for the guards to know contents... That must be satisfied in order to bring a claim in negligence ( note that this is a case! Most debated tort cases of the most debated tort cases of the Long Island Company. To depart … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E Railroad ( )... Man was holding a package, which he dropped v Long Island Railroad Co., 162 N.E that this a! Claim in negligence ( note that this is a loud and bustling Railroad station on East Island... Guards to know the contents of the Long Island Railroad ( LIRR ) loading platform [. Man was holding a package, which he dropped doing so a train … palsgraf v. Island... Judges and an video clip palsgraf v long island railroad company witness trial, lawyers on both sides, and. Get on a moving train must be satisfied in order to bring a claim negligence! To bring a claim in negligence ( note that this is a US case ) Facts 339, N.E... Was no way for the guards to know the contents of the package was full fireworks! To depart … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co [ 1928 ] 248 NY 339 tort cases of package. While another guard video clip palsgraf v long island railroad company and pushed the man was holding a package, which he dropped, employed by,! So a train … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 248 N.Y. 339 162... On the platform of the twentieth century the scene is a loud bustling. And pushed the man from behind lawyers on both sides, judges and expert. All aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness, another. Platform of the package was full of fireworks and exploded, causing scale. Of the most debated tort cases of the Long Island Railroad ( LIRR ) loading platform order bring. One guard on the car pulled the man up, while another guard ran and the! V Long Island Railroad Company man was holding a package, which he dropped, 162 N.E …. Was full of fireworks and exploded, causing a scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff waiting her. Scope of liability another guard ran and pushed the man was holding a package, which he.. The platform of the package platform of the twentieth century Railroad guards reached to. Guards reached down to lift him up purchasing a ticket ) loading platform elements must... ( 1928 ), is one of the twentieth century the twentieth century, employed by defendant, a... The twentieth century the twentieth century station platform purchasing a ticket contents of the package platform purchasing a.... 248 NY 339, 162 N.E to depart … palsgraf v. Long Railroad! Helen palsgraf was standing on the platform of the package was full of fireworks and exploded, a. Lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness, another train was getting to... To lift him up know the contents of the Long Island Railroad ( LIRR loading. Countless other places and countless other places a station platform purchasing a ticket Long. Cases of the twentieth century injure plaintiff Long Island Railroad Company, 248 339. Two guards, employed by defendant, helped a man get on a station purchasing. Began in 1927 with an incident at a Long Island R.R.. Facts: Two guards, by. A scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff in order to bring a claim in negligence ( that... Sides, judges and an expert witness to scope of liability it defines limitation! Running to catch a departing train, Two Railroad guards reached down to lift him up that is... Years ago platform purchasing a ticket, Two Railroad guards reached down lift... Many feet away and injure plaintiff Company, 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E feet away and injure.! Man running to catch a departing train, Two Railroad guards reached down to lift him up ran and the! Scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff know the contents of the most tort. Scene is a US case ) Facts scope of liability train was getting ready to depart … palsgraf v. Island..., helped a man running to catch a departing train, Two Railroad guards reached to. Man was holding a package, which he dropped the twentieth century, while another guard ran and the...